January, 2001
Field Crops 28.5-29
Predicting Corn Silage Harvest Dates
Joe Lauer, Corn Agronomist
PDF Version
One of the more difficult management decisions when producing corn silage is properly
timing harvest. Corn silage that is too wet will yield less, result in silo seepage
and produce a sour tasting silage resulting in lower intake by livestock. If corn
silage is too dry then yield is often reduced, heat damage and mold more easily
develops in the silo because fermentation is inadequate, and the silage has lower
protein, digestibility and the vitamins A and E.
Traditionally, most farmers would begin chopping corn silage around September 15.
Observations over the last 4 years indicate drydown rates between years vary dramatically.
For example, between 1996 and 1999 in Manitowoc County, the date when corn silage
moisture dropped to 65% was as early as September 6 and as late as October 3 (Figure
1). Farmers who chop their own corn silage and those who hire custom operators often
have the dilemma of predicting when a field will be ready to chop. Below are a few
suggestions for predicting when to begin harvest. Good communication with a custom
operator is essential as harvest date draws near.
Environment significantly influences the rate of drydown and start date for silage
harvest. Wet cool weather will slow drydown rate while hot, dry weather will speed
drydown rate. Table 1 describes the rates of drydown observed in various Wisconsin
counties since 1996. The silage production years of 1998 and 1999 were above normal
for heat accumulation and were characterized as rapid drydown years for both grain
and silage in numerous counties.
Table 1. Corn silage drydown rate (% moisture per day) for various counties in Wisconsin.
|
County
|
1996
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
Chippewa
|
---
|
0.4
|
---
|
---
|
Dodge
|
---
|
---
|
0.7
|
---
|
Fond du Lac
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
1.0
|
Jefferson
|
---
|
0.6
|
0.7
|
1.0
|
Manitowoc
|
0.4
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
0.8
|
Shawano
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
0.6
|
Sheboygan
|
---
|
0.8
|
---
|
---
|
Wakesha
|
---
|
0.6
|
0.9
|
---
|
Washington
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
0.7
|
Pre-season
Greatest corn grain and silage yield potential is with full-season hybrids. Reaching
physiological maturity (black layer) before a killing frost is not as critical for
corn silage as it is for grain production. Select and plant hybrids that vary in
maturity. This helps spread the risk associated with plant stress during pollination.
It will also spread the grain and silage harvest windows. For fields intended to
be chopped for corn silage, hybrid maturities can be 5-10 days longer season than
what is typically grown for grain on the field.
Planting season
Plant full-season hybrids first. Note date and maturity of the hybrid planted. Some
producers plant an "ultra" short-season hybrid (i.e. 75 d) early silage
harvest, so that fermented feed can be continued in the dairy cow ration during
early fall.
In-season
Note silking date. Silking date is the first indicator for predicting date of harvest
for grain or silage uses. It can be used to predict which fields are developing
ahead of schedule. Among corn hybrids the grain filling period is rather consistent
regardless of maturity. Hybrids differ in maturity during the vegetative period
of their development (planting to silking). Grain filling in Wisconsin usually lasts
about 55-60 days after silking. The dent (R5) stage occurs 35-42 days after silking
and black layer formation (R6) occurs 55-60 days after silking. Usually silage harvest
begins shortly after half-milk line on the kernels. The half-milk line stage occurs
about 13 days prior to black-layer (Wiersma et al., 1993). Thus, the predicted start
date of silage harvest (half-milk line) occurs 42-47 days after silking.
Once the kernel milk line begins to move down the kernel following the dent stage
(R5), the fields intended to be harvested for silage should be sampled for moisture.
The "trigger" to start sampling for moisture depends upon the silage storage
structure (Table 2). Once the moisture for the field is known use a dry-down rate
of 0.5% moisture loss per day to predict when the field will be ready for the storage
structure. For example, a field of corn that will be stored in a concrete stave
silo at 65% should be checked for moisture when kernel milk equals 60%. Let's say
the forage moisture of this field was found to be 68%. This field should be harvested
beginning [(68-65)/0.5 =] 6 days after sampling.
Table 2. Kernel milk stage "trigger" to begin sampling for various silage
structures.
|
Silo structure
|
Recommended moisture content for ensiling
|
Kernel milk stage "trigger"
|
|
%
|
%
|
Horizontal bunker
|
70 to 65
|
80
|
Bag
|
70 to 60
|
80
|
Upright concrete stave
|
65 to 60
|
60
|
Upright oxygen limiting
|
60 to 50
|
40
|
"trigger": kernel milk stage to begin checking silage moisture
Silage moisture decreases at an average rate of 0.5% per day during September
|
Harvest season
As a final check, the field should be sampled 1-2 days prior to harvest to determine
if the silage moisture is proper for the storage structures described in Table 1.
Follow recommended theoretical length of cut guidelines and make sure that good
packing takes place to ensure adequate fermentation and storage.
Summary
The following in-season guidelines can be used to predict corn silage harvest date:/font>
- Note hybrid maturity and planting date of fields intended for silage.
- Note silking date. Half milk of the kernels will typically occur about 42 to 47
days after silking.
- Once kernel milk line begins to move, measure moisture of fields intended to be
harvested for silage. Use 0.5% per day to predict date when field will be ready
for the storage structure.
- Final check prior to chopping.
Numerous management decisions need to be made for producing high yielding, high
quality silage. All will be for naught, however, if the silage cannot be chopped,
stored and ensiled at the proper moisture to allow for adequate fermentation and
storage.
Literature Cited
Wiersma, D. W., P. Carter, K. A. Albrecht, and J. G. Coors. 1993. Kernel milkline
stage and corn forage yield, quality, and dry matter content. J. Prod. Agric. 6:23-24,
94-99.