December 2003
Field Crops 28.5-36
Can We Manage Corn Silage Stover Quality?
Joe Lauer, Corn Agronomist
PDF Version
Summary
- Forage quality improvement in corn is due to increasing starch content as maturity
approaches.
- Hybrid selection and harvest date affected corn stover quality as measured by neutral
detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD).
- Plant density, planting date, and row spacing had no effect on corn stover quality
(NDFD).
- Not much can be done with harvest date as a management option due to the yield-quality
trade-off.
- Hybrid selection is the only practical option for managing NDFD.
Keywords: corn, silage, NDFD, starch, management
The dairy cow is ‘built' for digesting cell walls. Current guidelines (National
Research Council, 2001) for feeding corn silage are based upon numerous components
including neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD). For most forages, there
is a trade-off between NDFD and yield. As a crop matures NDFD decreases and yield
increases. Optimum harvest time is usually around flowering.
Corn is somewhat unique in the world of forages. The same yield and NDFD relationship
holds for corn around flowering, but OVERALL quality is optimized later near maturity
due to an increase in grain content which is highly digestible.
Our objective was to determine whether corn silage NDFD (cell wall digestibility)
could be influenced by various agronomic management decisions.
Between 1997 and 2002, corn silage management trials were conducted at numerous
locations in Wisconsin. Management factors included plant density, planting date,
row spacing and harvest date. Treatments changed over years as new hybrids and technology
advances became available. For all plots near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) scans
of forage were collected and archived.
The UW NIRS global equation for corn forage was updated for the 2002 UW Corn Hybrid
Performance Silage Trials. All data points used in the global equation were analyzed
by the Marshfield Plant and Soil Analysis Lab. The NIRS global equation was used
to determine the forage quality components of crude protein (CP), acid detergent
fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), in vitro true digestibility (IVTD),
and Starch content. NDFD was calculated (Van Soest, 1982).
Harvest date
Like other forages, corn yield is greatest after flowering near maturity (Darby
and Lauer, 2002). NDFD decreases after flowering and is lowest near maturity (Figure
1). Early harvest dates have greater NDFD. Starch content increases after flowering.
Quality (milk per ton) decreases after flowering. Unlike other forages, quality
(milk per ton) increases as maturity approaches. Thus, yield and quality are optimized
near maturity when nearly half of the forage dry matter is grain.
Plant density
Plant density did not affect corn NDFD. Corn forage quality increases observed with
increasing plant density are due to increases in starch content. Forage yield increases
with increasing plant density. But, forage quality (milk per ton) decreases. Thus,
an optimum plant density exists for milk per acre. The current recommendation for
corn forage production is to plant at a density similar to grain production and
err on the high side (~1000-2000 more plants/A). Recent work indicates that optimum
plant densities may be increasing.
Planting date
Planting dates after May 20 had lower forage yield, milk per ton (quality) and milk
per acre than earlier planting dates. Many late-planted fields are used for corn
silage production in Wisconsin. Planting date had no effect on corn NDFD. Delayed
planting dates lower starch content, which is largely responsible for decreases
in forage yield, milk per ton and milk per acre.
Row spacing
Row spacing did not affect forage NDFD or starch content. The small increase in
stover yield due to narrower row spacing is balanced by a small increase in grain
yield, so overall forage quality does not change.
Conclusions
Plant density, planting date, and row spacing had no effect on NDFD. Most quality
changes are due to changes in starch content as the plant matures. Hybrid selection
and harvest date are the only two management factors evaluated that affected NDFD.
Not much can be done with harvest date due to the yield-quality trade-off. Hybrid
selection is the only practical option for managing NDFD.
References
Darby, H. M. and J. G. Lauer. 2002. Harvest date and hybrid influence on corn forage
yield, qualtiy and preservation. Agronomy Journal 94:559-566.
National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. seventh
edition (revised):National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Van Soest, P. J. 1982. Nutritional ecology of the ruminants. Comstock Publishing
Associates, Cornell University Press. Ithaca, NY.
Figure 1. Change in NDFD and starch content of corn silage on various harvest
dates at Arlington, WI. Silking occurred between July 16 and 24 in each year.