January 2002
Field Crops 28.6-34
Practices Used By Wisconsin Top-Profit Corn and Soybean Farmers
Joe Lauer, Corn Agronomist
PDF Version
Production contests are popular among farmers and often stir up debate about the
"best" production practices for crops. Since 1987, UW Agronomy has been
conducting a contest for corn and soybean farmers called PEPS (Profits through Efficient
Production Systems). The forerunner of the Wisconsin PEPS contest was the UW Pacemaker
Yield Club run from 1956 to 1959. Over 550 farmers participated with the average
yield of club members exceeding 100 bu/A in five of six years. In 1981 the Wisconsin
Corn Growers Association perceived an over-emphasis on "maximum yields"
and sponsored a contest based on net monetary return per land area. From 1982 to
1986, a Conservation Tillage Corn Production contest was run based on the economics
of corn production. In 1987 this contest was expanded into the current PEPS contest
to include corn, soybeans and wheat. Currently, the contest is divided into three
divisions: 1) cash corn, 2) livestock corn (rotation with alfalfa or manure application),
and 3) soybean. Farmers need to manage nutrients and pesticides carefully to both
avoid adverse effects on the environment and to reduce costs of purchased inputs.
But farmers also must maintain a production level that will result in profitable
returns. Unlike other contests that emphasize yield, the PEPS contest emphasizes
efficiency and profitability. Its objectives are to recognize the practices utilized
by the st emphasizes efficiency and profitability. Its objectives are to recognize
the practices utilized by the most profitable farmers and to provide other
farmers, educators, and researchers insight into ways these farmers integrate practices
into a system. The contest also emphasizes soil and water conservation, efficiency,
profitability and competitiveness versus productivity alone.
Since 1987 a total of 1,358 farmers have participated in the contest. Profit groups
were determined by ranking contestants in quintiles by division, district and year.
The largest proportion of costs involve land, fertilizer and fixed + variable equipment
(Fig. 1). In the cash corn division, the average cost per acre has been $238 (minimum
= $215 during 1995; maximum = $260 during 1992). In the livestock corn division,
the average cost per acre is $206 (minimum = $186 during 1993; maximum = $235 during
1987). Average cost per bushel has been between $1.25 and $1.95 in the cash corn
division and $1.13 and $1.81 in the livestock corn division. In the soybean division,
average cost per acre has been $181 (minimum = $169 during 1988; maximum = $204
during 1987), and average cost per bushel has been between $3.30 and $4.08. Soybean
is $25-57/A cheaper to produce than corn. For both corn and soybean, better efficiency
(lower cost per bushel) occurs with higher yields.
Seed costs have increased 74% for corn and 59% for soybeans since the inception
of the contest in 1987. Fertilizer costs have not changed over time, but varies
up to 120% depending upon year. The variability is mostly due to the way in which
fertilizer costs are calculated using yield level and consequent P and K removal
rates. Variable equipment costs have increased 30% for both corn and soybeans.
Total acre cost of production between the top and bottom profit group is similar,
but grower return is not due to substantially higher yield (Fig. 2 and Table 1).
Acre cost difference between top and bottom profit groups is $13-24/A for corn and
$16/A for soybean (Table 1). Top corn farmers produce 38-47 bu/A more than the bottom
group, while top soybean farmers produce 18 bu/A more. Top corn farmers have 1.6-1.8%
lower grain moisture. Farmers in the top profit group tend to use land with lower
yield potential, rotate more frequently, plant about 3 to 6 days earlier, and make
0.3-0.5 fewer trips across the field.
A number of common production practices are observed among farmers in the top-profit
group in the PEPS contest. Top-profit farmers have or rent land with the capability
of yielding 140 to 160 bu/a (5-yr. average) -- and rent it for less than $90/acre.
They don't follow corn with corn thereby reducing N costs with credits from previous
legume (alfalfa or soybeans). Also, rotation does not require the use of rootworm
insecticide, and they can take full advantage of the "rotation effect"
increasing yields 5-10%. They select hybrids with high yield potential, fast dry-down,
and good standability and try to pay less than $60/bag. Top-profit farmers use tillage
sparingly and try to leave 30% residue cover at planting. They question whether
each pass is necessary and combine trips (for example; herbicide, fertilizer application
and tillage). They soil test and only apply nutrients needed or recommended using
the cheapest form of fertilizer per unit of N, P, or K and apply efficiently. They
use manure and legume credits to reduce purchased fertilizer costs. For corn they
don't cut back on overall N supplied unless they were over applying. They don't
use micronutrients unless soil tests recommend it. They plant early, between April
25 and May 5, and plant 26- to 30,000 (lighter soils) or 28- to 32,000 (medium-heavy
soils) kernels/acre. They use 30-inch rows. Top-profit farmers monitor insect (European
corn borer, corn rootworm) levels and apply insecticides only when economic thresholds
occur. They control weeds as "cheaply" as possible by knowing their weed
problem. They often use or consider band applications and/or timely rotary hoeing
and cultivation and sometimes cultivate increasing yield about 5% beyond weed control
benefits. They calibrate their sprayer and don't demand "perfect" weed
control. They harvest when kernel moistures are in the low to mid 20's if drying.
Other characteristics of top-profit farmers include a knack for substituting information
for more expensive purchased inputs. Information topics include hybrid performance
data, soil tests, manure analysis, pest scouting, and crop consultants or their
own on-farm trials.
The most profitable years are usually the highest yielding years. High yields still
require good weather. Springs need to be dry enough for early planting, but wet
enough to activate herbicides and promote good stands with uniform emergence. Ideal
summers have timely rain (1-inch per week), lots of sunshine, and temperatures in
mid-80's (day) and low 60's (night). Optimum falls have sunny, dry weather to speed
dry-down & allow harvest of "22% corn" by November 1.
"Best of the Best" aptly describes the farmers participating in this contest.
Results reflect the efforts and costs of the best farmers growing corn and soybeans
on the best land available. PEPS costs underestimate actual costs because not all
inputs are accounted for completely. Costs reflect only what can be documented.
It is difficult to accurately measure all indirect, incidental, and overhead costs
associated with a farm system. Also, the required 10-acre contest field is usually
placed on the best soils/fields of the farm and managed optimally. Thus, costs are
probably higher for most farmers.
In spite of these shortcomings, contest results continue to be useful to farmers
and industry. The contest provides an opportunity to identify production practices
of top-profit farmers, evaluate acceptance of recommended practices and identifies
new research problems in grain production systems.
Table 1. Farmer production, cost, and management practices for the top 20% and bottom
20% profit groups in PEPS (1987-1999).
|
|
|
Cash Corn
|
Livestock Corn
|
Soybean
|
|
|
Top
20%
|
Bottom
20%
|
Top
20%
|
Bottom
20%
|
Top
20%
|
Bottom
20%
|
Grain yield (bu/A)
|
|
182
|
144
|
177
|
130
|
63
|
45
|
Grain moisture (%)
|
|
21.0
|
22.8
|
22.9
|
24.5
|
12.7
|
13.0
|
Acre cost ($/A)
|
|
$224
|
$248
|
$190
|
$203
|
$173
|
$189
|
Bushel cost ($/bu)
|
|
$1.25
|
$1.79
|
$1.09
|
$1.61
|
$2.77
|
$4.31
|
Grower return ($/A)
|
|
$187
|
$74
|
$213
|
$94
|
$198
|
$74
|
NRCS yield (bu/A)
|
|
111
|
121
|
106
|
109
|
114
|
124
|
Previous crop (%)
|
Corn
|
6
|
30
|
9
|
32
|
87
|
91
|
|
Legume
|
71
|
41
|
64
|
43
|
4
|
3
|
|
Other
|
23
|
29
|
27
|
25
|
9
|
6
|
Tillage (%)
|
No-Till
|
21
|
24
|
7
|
12
|
25
|
31
|
|
Min-Till
|
33
|
18
|
20
|
13
|
20
|
22
|
|
Chisel
|
31
|
31
|
25
|
22
|
26
|
23
|
|
Moldboard
|
14
|
27
|
48
|
52
|
29
|
23
|
Relative maturity
|
|
101
|
100
|
100
|
98
|
3.3
|
2.0
|
Planting date
|
|
5 May
|
8 May
|
8 May
|
11 May
|
15 May
|
21 May
|
Seeding rate (no./A)
|
|
29,200
|
33,100
|
28,700
|
28,700
|
166,000
|
197,000
|
Row width (%)
|
<= 30 in.
|
79
|
69
|
70
|
62
|
88 *
|
90 *
|
|
>30 in.
|
21
|
31
|
30
|
38
|
12 *
|
10 *
|
Field Trips (no.)
|
|
5.9
|
6.2
|
6.7
|
7.1
|
5.3
|
5.8
|
Starter (%)
|
|
54
|
50
|
36
|
41
|
6
|
17
|
Fertilizer N (lb/A)
|
|
128
|
135
|
69
|
83
|
-
|
-
|
Legume N (lb/A)
|
|
30
|
13
|
82
|
61
|
-
|
-
|
Insecticide (%)
|
|
2
|
17
|
3
|
8
|
-
|
-
|
Inoculant (%)
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
80
|
91
|
* Soybean row spacing categories are < 30 in. and 30 in.
|