August 2006
Field Crops 28.61-43
Changing Corn Production Practices When Energy Costs Increase
Joe Lauer, Corn Agronomist
PDF Version
Guidelines
- Management decisions that can dramatically affect energy costs in corn production
include: hybrid maturity, planting date, fertilizer rate, tillage (or number of
field operations), irrigation, and transgenic technologies (pest control).
- When selecting hybrids using performance data, consider yield and moisture rather
than yield alone. Use anticipated grain prices and drying costs to figure profit
potential for different hybrids.
- Hybrid maturity directly affects profit and energy conservation. To reduce drying
costs, farmers should choose high-yielding hybrids which are as dry as practical
at harvest.
- Understanding your farm growing season (first and last frost dates, GDU accumulation,
planting date, etc.) and field characteristics (slope, aspect, soil texture, surface
residue, etc.) will help in selecting adapted hybrids.
- Plant full-season hybrids first followed by shorter-season hybrids on dates that
ensure maturity before fall frost. If planting is delayed, switch to shorter-season
hybrids.
- Reduce the number of trips across the field by moving to reduced- or no-till planting
systems. Also, consider using transgenic crops to reduce the number of trips and
chemical costs for control of pests.
- Harvesting at 20 to 25% grain moisture is a reasonable compromise between drying
cost and harvest loss.
Energy prices have risen dramatically. Since corn is an energy intensive crop, efficient
energy management is a major factor in maintaining a profitable production program.
Management decisions that can dramatically affect energy costs in corn production
include: hybrid maturity, fertilizer rate, planting date, tillage (or number of
field operations), and transgenic technologies (pest control). Nitrogen fertilizer
and artificial drying are the major energy factors in corn production.
Hybrid maturity
Relative maturity (RM) is determined by comparing grain moisture of hybrids at harvest.
Corn is mature when kernels reach maximum dry weight. Optimum RM depends upon the
harvest, use and storĀage methods on each farm. Corn for silage is ready as early
as 10 days prior to maximum kernel dry weight, while corn picked for grain is not
ready until grain moisture content reaches 23 to 28%.
Longer-season hybrids have greater potential for higher yields at most locations.
In southern WI, as RM increases, grain yield increases 2.2 bu/A. At a corn price
of $2.50 and drying cost of $0.02 per point moisture bushel, grower return increases
$4.00 /A for each RM unit.
For example, at Arlington grain yield increases to a maximum at 106-days RM (Figure
1a). At most locations, a significant relationship exists between grain yield and
RM. However, at Marshfield and Valders, no relationship between grain yield and
RM exists over multiple years of testing (Table 1).
The optimum relative maturity for grower return depends upon the corn drying method
(Table 2). The RM that optimizes grower return is different from the RM that optimizes
grain yield when drying costs are involved. For example, at Arlington using an on-farm
drying method, grower return is greatest with a corn hybrid RM of 101-days RM (Figure
1b and Table 2). At Marshfield, a 93-day hybrid optimizes grower return.
Although farmers generally get greatest yields by plantĀing full-season hybrids
early, many short-season hybrids produce yields competitive with the best full-season
hybrids and are drier at harvest (Figures 1a and 1b).
Traditionally, the mix of hybrid maturities grown on a farm vary according to the
risk one is willing to assume (i.e. 25% of acres grown to full-season, 50% to mid-season,
and 25% to short-season maturities). Others recommend mixing hybrid maturities according
to the type of environment predicted. The best approach may be to select hybrid
maturities based solely on the intended use and drying method in the production
system.
Figure 1. The relationship of relative maturity with a) grain yield and b) grower
return ($2.50 corn price, on-farm drying) at Arlington, WI (1995-2004).
Table 1. Optimum relative maturity (days RM) for grain yield at various locations
in WI.
|
Location
|
Years tested
|
Optimum RM
|
Arlington
|
1995-2004
|
106
|
Janesville
|
1996-1997
|
107
|
Lancaster
|
1996-1997
|
112
|
Fond du Lac
|
1996-1997
|
103
|
Hancock
|
1995-2004
|
104
|
Chippewa Falls
|
1999-2001
|
104
|
Marshfield
|
1999-2004
|
---
|
Seymour
|
1999-2001
|
102
|
Valders
|
1999-2001
|
---
|
Table 2 . Optimum relative maturity (days RM) for three corn production systems.
|
System:Drying Cost
|
Grain price ($/bu)
|
($ / point bu)
|
$2.00
|
$2.50
|
$3.00
|
PEPS
|
Arlington, WI
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial:$0.04
|
--
|
98
|
99
|
98
|
On-Farm:$0.02
|
100
|
101
|
102
|
101
|
Livestock:$0.00
|
106
|
106
|
106
|
107
|
Janesville, WI
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial:$0.04
|
104
|
105
|
105
|
105
|
On-Farm:$0.02
|
106
|
106
|
106
|
106
|
Livestock:$0.00
|
107
|
107
|
107
|
108
|
Lancaster, WI
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial:$0.04
|
106
|
112
|
112
|
112
|
On-Farm:$0.02
|
112
|
112
|
112
|
112
|
Livestock:$0.00
|
112
|
112
|
112
|
112
|
Fond du Lac, WI
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial:$0.04
|
--
|
---
|
99
|
99
|
On-Farm:$0.02
|
100
|
101
|
101
|
101
|
Livestock:$0.00
|
103
|
103
|
103
|
103
|
Hancock, WI
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial:$0.04
|
--
|
--
|
98
|
--
|
On-Farm:$0.02
|
100
|
100
|
101
|
100
|
Livestock:$0.00
|
104
|
104
|
104
|
103
|
Chippewa Falls, WI
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial:$0.04
|
--
|
--
|
97
|
--
|
On-Farm:$0.02
|
98
|
99
|
100
|
98
|
Livestock:$0.00
|
104
|
104
|
104
|
104
|
Marshfield, WI
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial:$0.04
|
89
|
90
|
91
|
89
|
On-Farm:$0.02
|
92
|
93
|
93
|
92
|
Livestock:$0.00
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Seymour, WI
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial:$0.04
|
--
|
--
|
97
|
--
|
On-Farm:$0.02
|
98
|
99
|
99
|
98
|
Livestock:$0.00
|
102
|
102
|
102
|
101
|
Valders, WI
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial:$0.04
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
On-Farm:$0.02
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Livestock:$0.00
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Planting date
Understanding your farm growing season (first and last frost dates, GDU accumulation,
planting date, etc.) and field characteristics (slope, aspect, soil texture, surface
residue, etc.) will help in selecting adapted hybrids. Plant full-season hybrids
first followed by shorter-season hybrids on dates that ensure maturity before fall
frost. If planting is delayed, switch to shorter-season hybrids.