How "Precise" Is Precision Farming?
April 11, 1996 3(5):32-34
Joe Lauer, Corn Agronomist
One of the new trends in agriculture is the idea of "precision farming"
or "site-specific management" of crop production fields. The goal of precision
farming is to identify sources of variability within a field and then manage that
variability. Two types of variability are most prevalent in a field -- spatial and
temporal. Spatial or field variability is the difference in crop performance on
numerous sites within the field. Temporal or season variability is the difference
in crop performance on one same site within a field. Agronomists have long recognized
the problems associated with field and season variability and deal with these sources
of variability through statistics.
Many technologies are converging which allow growers to manage spatial variability.
The question is largely one of economics. The techniques and technology required
to identify field variation include soil surveys, yield monitors, positioning systems,
soil sampling, sensors, computers and equipment with the capability of applying
variable rates of agricultural inputs. Examples of management inputs that "even
up" field variability include drainage and variable fertilizer, seeding, and
pesticide rates.
Season variation is much more difficult to assess and manage because it involves
predicting the weather and extrapolating these effects on crop production. Other
interactions, such as diseases, insects, and other pests, can influence season variation.
One example of a management factor that is often used to "smooth out"
season variability is irrigation.
Variability is measured by evaluating discrete sites in a field over time. Yield
monitors along with global positioning systems do a very good job of measuring field
variability. Yield maps help assess the amount of variability and help to define
a management area from which various input levels can be recommended. Field yield
maps over many growing seasons will estimate season variability.How much variability
can be expected at one site within a field over a number of seasons? Below is the
data for four sites in a six-acre field over the last ten seasons. The soil is a
Plano silt loam and the field is located near Arlington, WI. Each site measured
30 feet by 35 feet and had been cropped continuously to corn since 1983. The corners
of each site were located in the exact same place every season.
Table 1. Corn yields over time at four sites in a field near Arlington, WI.
|
Site
|
1986
|
1987
|
1988
|
1989
|
1990
|
1991
|
1992
|
1993
|
1994
|
1995
|
|
Season
range *
|
Season
deviation
|
1
|
165
|
190
|
89
|
148
|
151
|
144
|
144
|
90
|
142
|
125
|
|
101
|
31
|
2
|
180
|
161
|
63
|
141
|
158
|
135
|
156
|
81
|
165
|
113
|
|
117
|
38
|
3
|
169
|
157
|
55
|
148
|
143
|
132
|
138
|
86
|
167
|
126
|
|
114
|
36
|
4
|
176
|
159
|
44
|
154
|
152
|
133
|
151
|
71
|
174
|
119
|
|
132
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Field range
|
15
|
33
|
45
|
13
|
15
|
12
|
18
|
19
|
32
|
13
|
|
|
|
Field deviation
|
7
|
16
|
19
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
8
|
8
|
14
|
6
|
|
|
|
* Range = Maximum - minimum. Deviation = Standard deviation.
|
During 1986, the average yield of all four sites in a field was 173 bushels per
acre (Table 1). The range between the highest and lowest yielding sites was 15 bushels
per acre while the field standard deviation was 7 bushels per acre. Every site produced
the greatest yield within a season, at least one time during the 10-season period.
Site 1 produced an average yield of 139 bushels per acre over the ten season period.
On site 1, the range between the highest and lowest yielding season was 101 bushels
per acre, while the season standard deviation was 31 bushels per acre.
The field range between the maximum and minimum yielding sites within a year averaged
23 bushels per acre (Table 2). Field yield variability as measured by standard deviation
averaged 9 bushels per acre over the ten-season period. The season range between
the maximum and minimum yielding seasons for a site averaged 116 bushels per acre.
Season yield variability as measured by standard deviation averaged 37 bushels per
acre over the four sites.
Table 2. Average field and season (1986-1995) variability of corn at four sites in
a field near Arlington, WI.
|
Variability source
|
Average
|
Range average
|
Deviation average
|
Yield (bushels per acre)
|
Field
|
135
|
23
|
9
|
Season
|
135
|
116
|
37
|
Grower return when corn price at $2.00 per bushel (dollars per acre)
|
Field
|
270
|
43
|
19
|
Season
|
270
|
232
|
75
|
Grower return when corn price at $2.75 per bushel (dollars per acre)
|
Field
|
371
|
59
|
26
|
Season
|
371
|
319
|
103
|
Grower return when corn price at $3.50 per bushel (dollars per acre)
|
Field
|
472
|
75
|
33
|
Season
|
472
|
406
|
131
|
Yield monitors will help producers evaluate "precision farming" technology
and assist in identifying field management zones that need to be modified in order
to "smooth out" field variability. They also have the potential to assist
the grower in making better management decisions. In this example, if all field
variability could be removed by utilizing precision farming techniques and bringing
yield up to the level of the maximum site, there would be an average maximum gain
of 23 bushels per acre. However, season variation was four times that of field variation
(37 v. 9 bushels per acre). An average seasonal range of 116 bushels per acre was
observed for the same site in a field. This relationship between field and season
variation held regardless of corn price. Depending upon corn price, grower return
could increase between 43 and 75 dollars per acre by eliminating site differences
within a field. Grower return due to season differences ranged from 232 to 406 dollars
per acre depending upon corn price. Season variation is the overriding source of
variation for any site in a field. It is also the most difficult variation to manage
in a production field.