Hail and Lodging Events After Silking: What are the Consequences for Yield?
September 7, 2000 7(24):148-149
Joe Lauer, Corn Agronomist
The month of August has been especially noteworthy in 2000 because of the number
of storms that have had hail and high winds. Some fields in western Wisconsin have
been hailed and flattened up to four times this season. Also, we have observed in
our plots less brace root formation and smaller stalk diameters. With the exception
of the most recent storms, corn has recovered quickly (within 2 days), but there
is significant lower stalk curvature. As the season progresses less recovery will
take place. I have received a number of questions asking about the yield consequences
of hail loss and lodging after silking.
Hail Damage
The effect of hail damage on corn yield is well documented in agronomic literature.
Hail adjusters use standard tables to calculate compensation for yield loss associated
with hail. The amount of yield loss due to stand reduction is estimated about 7-10
days after a hail event. Four assessments are made on corn when hail occurs after
silking (Vorst, 1990) including:
- Determining yield loss due to stand reduction,
- Determining yield loss due to defoliation,
- Determining direct ear damage, and
- Bruising and stalk damage.
Determining yield loss due to stand reduction is made by comparing yield potential
of the field at its original population with yield potential at its now-reduced
population. Yield loss after silking is adjusted directly by determining the percentage
of killed plants. Likewise ear damage yield losses are adjusted directly by determining
the percentage of damaged kernels on ears.
In corn, most yield reduction due to hail damage is a result of leaf loss. To determine
yield loss due to defoliation, both the growth stage of the field and the percent
leaf area removed from the plant must be determined. Significant yield damage due
to defoliation occurs immediately after silking and decreases as the plant matures
(Table 1).
Table 1. Estimated percent corn yield loss due to defoliation occurring at various
stages of growth.
|
|
Percent leaf area destroyed
|
|
20
|
40
|
60
|
80
|
100
|
Tassel
|
7
|
21
|
42
|
68
|
100
|
Silked
|
7
|
20
|
39
|
65
|
97
|
Blister
|
5
|
16
|
30
|
50
|
73
|
Milk
|
3
|
12
|
24
|
41
|
59
|
Dough
|
2
|
8
|
17
|
29
|
41
|
Dent
|
0
|
4
|
10
|
17
|
23
|
Black layer
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
derived from National Crop Insurance Service Bulletin
|
Damage due to bruising is determined at harvest by counting the number of lodged
plants. Bruising may allow an avenue of infection for stalk rots and molds that
cause mycotoxin problems. Weather conditions during the remainder of the season
affect disease severity.
Lodging Damage
The time from silking to maturity is the time kernels are filled. Sugars are needed
to simultaneously support the developing kernels and maintain stalk strength. Anything
that restricts production or movement of sugars or competes with the stalk or kernels
will decrease yield and increase death of root and stalk cells. Rotting organisms
more easily enter the stalk reducing stalk strength. Numerous factors restrict or
compete for sugars during grain fill including high grain yield, cloudy weather,
drought stress, high temperatures, hail, early frost, leaf diseases, and European
corn borer. The effect of lodging on various plant physiological processes such
as energy required for altering stalk growth, nutrient uptake, water uptake, and
light penetration and how these processes influence subsequent yield is not well
studied.
The most sensitive stage for lodging to occur is during late vegetative growth stages
when the stalk is at full height and brace roots have not yet formed. In a Wisconsin
study, lodging occurring at V10 caused little damage, while lodging events that
occurred near silking caused 15 to 30 percent yield loss in hand harvested plots
(Carter and Hudelson, 1988). The upper regions of the plants straightened to vertical
within 2 days following lodging. Lodging during vegetative growth stages did not
affect plant development, as silk dates were identical for all treatments and lodging
did not influence harvest grain moisture. Later lodging events lowered ear height
more than 24 inches due to pronounced lower-stalk curvature.
No research has documented yield loss damage from specific lodging events after
silking. Defoliation (Afuakwa and Crookston, 1984) effects on yield may provide
some insight (Tables 1 and 2). Much will depend upon the ability of the plant to
recover to an upright stature.
Table 2. Grain yield loss after plants killed or defoliated.
|
Corn Development Stage
|
Plants
Killed
|
Plants
Defoliated
|
|
percent yield loss
|
R4 (Soft dough)
|
55
|
35
|
R5 (Dent)
|
40
|
25
|
R5.5 (50% kernel milk)
|
12
|
5
|
R6 (Black layer)
|
0
|
0
|
derived from Afuakwa and Crookston, 1984
|
Guidelines for Managing Fields after Late-Season Hail and Lodging Events
The types of options available to farmers vary from farm-to-farm and field-to-field.
On a farm basis, the decision hinges on availability of other corn handling systems
involving drying capacity, silage storage facilities, high moisture corn handling
equipment, snaplage equipment, etc. On a field basis, things to consider are plant
recovery, mold development, moisture levels for ensiling, effects on maturation
rate, and yield and quality. Safer storage of corn predisposed to mold causing organisms
can be achieved by drying grain to 15.5% moisture, ensiling at the proper moisture
for the storage structure, or treating high moisture corn with propionic or acetic
acid.
Silage: Consider chopping a hailed or lodged field for silage, especially
if grain prices are low. If ensiling, damaged corn should be stored separately from
other silage already put up. Damaged corn may have lower quality, and by storing
separately, there is an option of mixing poor and good silages to obtain a satisfactory
ration, or feeding the damaged silage to animals that do not have high quality forage
requirements. Rotary cutter heads for silage chopping may not be useable in lodged
corn (Greg Andrews, UWEX Pierce County Agent, Personal communication).
Grain: The amount of stalk straightening decreases when lodging occurs at
VT or later. Harvest speed will likely need to be reduced, especially for lodging
occurring later. Test weight will likely be reduced.
Weather has a strong influence on harvesting. It not only influences harvest timing,
but also rate of stalk degradation and whether plants will be able to stand until
you get to them. Temperature, rain, snow and wind all play key roles in the amount
of lodging. Assessing the severity of lodging in fields will help in scheduling
grain harvest later. Watch closely fields that were severely lodged and adjust timing
of harvest if required.
Literature Cited
Afuakwa, J. J. and R. K. Crookston. 1984. Using the kernel milk line to visually
monitor grain maturity in maize. Cop Science 24:687-691.
Carter, P. R. and K. D. Hudelson. 1988. Influence of simulated wind lodging on corn
growth and grain yield. J. Prod. Agric. 1:295-299.
Vorst, J. V. 1990. Assessing Hail Damage to Corn. National Corn Handbook NCH-1:4
pp.