Some Pros and Cons of Letting Corn Stand in the Field Through Winter
October 15, 2004 11(26):170-171
Joe Lauer, Corn Agronomist
Due to late corn planting dates, some farmers are considering leaving their corn
in the field through winter and harvesting in the spring. Delayed planting combined
with below normal heat units for the 2004 growing season has resulted in a crop
that is behind normal development. As of September 19, only 43% of the corn in Wisconsin
was dented making the corn crop more vulnerable to early frost damage before it
reaches physiological maturity. Even if it's not damaged by frost, immature
corn will exhibit higher moisture which will increase drying costs and lower test
weight (weight per bushel at 15.5% moisture), a key indicator of quality in corn.
Every year some fields in Wisconsin are harvested in the spring. If the stalks stay
standing and there isn't much ear drop, snow cover or wildlife damage; the crop
can get through the winter without much yield loss. Ear drop will vary by hybrid
and environmental conditions as well as the amount of grain on the ear (smaller
ears should stay attached better than larger ears). If winter conditions are cool
without snow then corn will continue to dry and can be harvested throughout the
winter without too much yield loss. Stalks will become brittle and broken corn parts
may decrease the grade causing discounts at the elevator.
Since we cannot predict the weather, the most prudent decision would be to harvest
after a reasonable period of drydown. In some years with heavy snow cover, grain
yield can decrease significantly (Table 1). For example, during 2000 grain yield
decreased 65% by March and by spring yield decreased 37% from an October harvest
date. This is contrasted with the winter following 2001 (little snow cover) when
yield only decreased 18% by February and by spring was 10% lower than October harvest.
Greatest grain moisture loss occurs during October and November (Table 2). Drying
continues through the winter, but at a slower rate than October and November. This
is especially true for later planting dates. By the following spring there is little
difference in grain moisture for early versus later planted fields. Grain test weight
changes are minimal regardless of planting date (Table 3). Since grain moisture
changes are minimal past December and grain yield losses can be significantly affected
by environment, the best decision is to complete harvest by December (or the typical
first heavy snowfall, if you are good at predicting such things).
Table 1. Grain yield (bu/A) change of corn left standing in the field through winter
at Arlington, WI.
|
|
Harvest month
|
Year
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
2000
|
204
|
206
|
113
|
86
|
83
|
72
|
127
|
2001
|
220
|
208
|
208
|
200
|
181
|
205
|
199
|
Mean
|
212
|
206
|
165
|
145
|
134
|
145
|
162
|
Table 2. Grain moisture (%) change of corn left standing in the field through winter.
Data are summarized for the 1992, 1993, 1994, 2000, and 2001 production seasons
at Arlington, WI.
|
Planting
|
Harvest month
|
dates
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
before May 11
|
31
|
21
|
20
|
19
|
18
|
15
|
12
|
May 11 to May 31
|
37
|
27
|
22
|
22
|
18
|
16
|
10
|
after May 31
|
46
|
37
|
28
|
27
|
23
|
20
|
15
|
Table 3. Grain test weight (lb/bu) change of corn left standing in the field through
winter. Data are summarized for the 1992, 1993, and 1994 production seasons at Arlington,
WI.
|
Planting
|
Harvest month
|
dates
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
before May 11
|
58
|
55
|
54
|
55
|
54
|
55
|
56
|
May 11 to May 31
|
57
|
50
|
52
|
51
|
53
|
50
|
52
|
after May 31
|
51
|
44
|
46
|
46
|
46
|
47
|
48
|