Jerusalem artichoke
    
    
        D. R. Cosgrove1, E. A. Oelke2, J. D. Doll3, D.
        W. Davis2, D. J. Undersander3, and E. S. Oplinger3
    
        1Department of Plant and Earth Sciences, University of Wisconsin - River
        Falls, WI 54022.
        
        2Departments of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, and Horticulture, University
        of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55l08.
        
        3Departments of Agronomy and Soil Science, College of Agriculture and
        Life Sciences and Cooperative Extension Service, University of Wisconsin-Madison,
        WI 53706.
        February, 1991.
    
        I. History:
    
        Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) is familiar to many as a weed,
        but has some potential as a crop plant. Native to the central regions of North America,
        the plant can be grown successfully throughout the U.S. under a variety of temperature
        and rainfall regimes. Several North American Indian tribes used Jerusalem artichoke
        as food prior to the arrival of European settlers. The explorer Champlain took Jerusalem
        artichokes from North America to France in 1605. By the mid 1600s it was widely
        used as a human food and livestock feed there.
    
        In France, the artichoke is called "topinambour," although the word "Jerusalem"
        has several explanations. The artichoke became a staple food for North American
        pilgrims and was thought of as a new feed in a "new Jerusalem." A second
        theory is that the word Jerusalem is a twisting of the Italian word for sunflower-girasol.
        One additional explanation involves a 17th century gardener named Petrus Hondins
        of Ter-Heusen, Holland who was known to distribute his artichoke apples throughout
        Europe. Ter-Heusen was modified to Jerusalem in the United States. In recent years
        the fresh tubers have been widely marketed in the U.S., but in quite limited quantities.
    
        II. Uses:
    
        The plant can be grown for human consumption, alcohol production, fructose production
        and livestock feed.
    
        A. Human Food:
    
        Similar to water chestnuts in taste, the traditional use of the tuber is as a gourmet
        vegetable. Jerusalem artichoke tubers resemble potatoes except the carbohydrates
        composing 75 to 80% of the tubers are in the form of inulin rather than starch.
        Once the tubers are stored in the ground or refrigerated, the inulin is converted
        to fructose and the tubers develop a much sweeter taste. Dehydrated and ground tubers
        can be stored for long periods without protein and sugar deterioration. Tubers can
        be prepared in ways similar to potatoes. In addition, they can be eaten raw, or
        made into flour, or pickled. They are available commercially under several names,
        including sunchokes and lambchokes.
    
        B. Alchohol Production:
    
        In France the artichoke has been used for wine and beer production for many years.
        Ethanol and butanol, two fuel grade alcohols, can be produced from Jerusalem artichokes.
        The cost of producing ethanol currently is not competitive with gasoline prices,
        and therefore the success of ethanol plants has been limited.
    
        C. Fructose Production:
    
        About 50% of the 12 million tons of sugar consumed annually by Americans is grown
        and produced in the United States. Fructose is more soluble in water than sucrose,
        so fructose provides a more desirable syrup. In addition, it is 1.5 times sweeter
        than sucrose and can be consumed safely by diabetics.
    
        The majority of domestically produced fructose is obtained from corn. Although the
        Jerusalem artichoke is a viable fructose source, the U.S. sugar industry has been
        hesitant in utilizing it because farmers have been concerned with its potential
        as a weed problem, and because it requires extra planting and harvesting equipment
        along with storage difficulties.
    
        D. Forage Production:
    
        The quality of artichoke tops make them a suitable livestock feed, but the forage
        quality has no advantage over other forage crops and should be classified as a maintenance
        feed. Both crude protein and digestible protein concentrations are low when compared
        with alfalfa (Table 1.) Artichoke tops are superior in TDN to the perennial forages
        listed, but it has less TDN than corn silage.
    
        
            | Table 1. Feeding value and forage quality characteristics of Jerusalem artichoke
                    tops and tubers and other selected forages. | 
        
            | Forage | DM1 | TDN | DP | CP | CF | 
        
            |  | -------------------- % -------------------- | 
        
            | Jerusalem artichoke tops | 27 | 67 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 
        
            | Jerusalem artichoke tubers | 21 | 78 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 
        
            | Alfalfa, full bloom | 91 | 53 | 10 | 14 | 35 | 
        
            | Smooth brome, post bloom | 94 | 46 | 2 | 6 | 33 | 
        
            | Corn silage | 29 | 70 | 5 | 8 | 22 | 
        
            | Beet pulp | 91 | 75 | 5 | 10 | 21 | 
        
            | Morrison. Feeds & Feeding p. 1018 22 ed. 1DM-Dry matter, TDN-Total
                digestible nutrients, DP-Digestible proteins, CP-Crude protein, CF-Crude fiber. | 
    
    
        Optimal forage quality can be obtained by harvesting tops during mid September when
        protein levels will be at their maximum. However, tuber yields will be reduced at
        this time (Table 2). The smaller size may make the tubers unharvestable. For greater
        tuber production it is more advantageous to harvest the tops after a hard frost.
        Protein levels in the forage will be reduced, but will still provide an acceptable
        feed. Roots, tubers and tops can be fed as a combined ration. Tops can be fed fresh
        or ensiled, although the forage does not ensile well because of its high concentration
        of soluble sugars and high moisture content. The potential advantage of the crop
        for forage may arise from the fact that it adapts well to a wide variety of soils
        and habitats.
    
        
            | Table 2. The effect of top harvest and tuber yield of Jerusalem artichokes in 8-row,
                    30-foot plots on peat soil at North Branch, MN-1981. | 
        
            | Cutting Scheme* | Top Fresh Wt | Tuber Fresh Wt | Fresh Wt/Tuber | Total Dry Wt | 
        
            |  | ---------- lb/acre ---------- | g | lb/acre | 
        
            | 1 | 25637 | 1429 | 30.5 | 3298 | 
        
            | 2 | 23961 | 1457 | - | 3533 | 
        
            | 3 | 40584 | 1407 | 14.0 | 5689 | 
        
            | 4 | 5772 | 10654 | 57.5 | 7591 | 
        
            | LSD | 2990 | 874 | 31 | 474 | 
        
            | * 1-Top harvest in early August 2-Top harvest in early August and early September
                3-Top harvest in early September 4-No top harvest prior to maturity Source: Waters,
                et. Al., University of Minnesota | 
    
    
        III. Growth Habits:
    
        The Jerusalem artichoke is a perennial with tuber bearing rhizomes. Stems are stout,
        pubescent and grow 3 to 12 ft in height. The leaves range from 12 to 3 in. wide
        and 4 to 8 in. in length. The plant bears many yellow flower heads in late August
        and September that are approximately 12 to 3 in. in diameter. The thick, rough textured
        leaves have coarse hairs on the upper surface and fine pubescence underneath. They
        are opposite on the lower part of the plant and alternate on the upper portion.
    
        The tubers vary from knobby to round clusters, range from red to white in color,
        and are rougher in conformation than potato tubers. Cultivated varieties yield white
        tubers that are clustered near the main stem in contrast to wild types which produce
        reddish elongated tubers at the end of long rhizomes.
    
        IV. Environment Requirements:
    
        A. Climatic:
    
        Most cultivars require a growing season of at least 125 frost-free days. Optimum
        yields are obtained where temperatures range from 65 to 80o F. Rainfall
        of 50 in. or less is required. In dry areas irrigation may be necessary to begin
        germination.
    
        B. Soil:
    
        Although the plant adapts well to a wide range of soil types and pH levels, artichoke
        production is favored by slightly alkaline soils. Yields are poor on heavy clays,
        particularly if there is waterlogging. Tuber and top yields are limited if soil
        moisture is less than 30% of field capacity during the tuber formation period (early
        September to November).
    
        C. Seed Preparation and Germination:
    
        Tubers sprout approximately 10 to 17 days after planting, but soil temperatures
        must be at least 44o F before germination begins. Jerusalem artichokes
        are propagated vegetatively by the use of sound, disease-free small tubers or pieces
        of tubers weighing approximately 2 oz and having at least 2 to 3 buds each.
    
        V. Cultural Practices:
    
        A. Method and Rate of Seeding:
    
        Recommended planting rates of 1,000 lb/acre of seedstock tubers yield between 10,000
        to 14,000 plants/acre. The tubers and tuber pieces are cut to approximately 1 to
        2 oz in size and planted 12 to 24 in. apart with 30 to 36 in. between rows.
    
        Table 3 shows yields of two varieties at two plant populations in 3 row, 20 ft plots
        in Minnesota. Fresh weight yields were higher with 18 in. x 12 in. spacings (29,040
        tubers/acre) than 36 in. x 24 in. spacings (7,260 tubers/acre). These studies were
        conducted using 2 oz tuber pieces. Further Minnesota studies have indicated no difference
        in yield between 1 and 2 oz tubers; however, 1 oz tubers may be more susceptible
        to dessication in dry soils.
    
        Planting depths are similar to potatoes. Tubers should be covered by 2 to 4 in.
        of soil. Hilling is recommended to increase moisture retention and to concentrate
        the tubers for easier harvesting. Because it is difficult to remove all of the tubers
        during harvest, additional planting may not be necessary in the second year.
    
        
            | Table 3. Tuber yield of two Jerusalem artichoke varieties in two plant populations
                    on sand soil at the Staples Irrigation Center, Staples, MN-1981. | 
        
            | Variety | Spacing | Tuber Fresh Wt | Dry Wt/Tuber | 
        
            |  | (inches) | (lb/acre) | (g) | 
        
            | Mammoth French White | 36 x 24 | 9791 | 9.1 | 
        
            | Mammoth French White | 18 x 12 | 16011 | 5.6 | 
        
            | Columbia | 36 x 24 | 24442 | 10.5 | 
        
            | Columbia | 18 x 12 | 34503 | 6.0 | 
        
            | LSD |  | 6331 | 1.8 | 
        
            | Source: Waters, et. Al., University of Minnesota | 
    
    
        B. Fertilization:
    
        University of Minnesota trials on irrigated, leached sand soil have found increases
        in tuber yield in response to nitrogen rates of 60 and 120 lb/acre (Table 4). Yield
        increases in response to potassium were observed at rates of 150 lb/acre, but only
        at high nitrogen rates. Fertility programs similar to that of potatoes are suggested
        as a starting point for artichokes.
    
        
            | Table 4. Response of Jerusalem artichokes to nitrogen (N) and potas- sium (K) fertilizer
                    on leached, sand soil at the Staples Irrigation Center, Staples, MN – 1981. | 
        
            | Fertilizer Applied (lb/acre) | Tuber Wt | Dry Wt/Tuber | 
        
            | N | K |  |  | 
        
            | -------- lb/acre -------- | lb/acre | g | 
        
            | 0 | 0 | 9082 | 7.8 | 
        
            | 0 | 150 | 8467 | 8.7 | 
        
            | 60 | 0 | 11243 | 9.6 | 
        
            | 60 | 150 | 11831 | 11.4 | 
        
            | 120 | 150 | 13129 | 11.4 | 
        
            | LSD |  | 1520 | 3.2 | 
        
            | Source: Waters, et. Al., University of Minnesota | 
    
    
        C. Varieties:
    
        Many varieties of Jerusalem artichoke exist worldwide. Popular varieties in the
        U.S. and yields in Minnesota in small plot trials are listed in Table 5.
    
        D. Weed Control:
    
        1. Mechanical - Jerusalem artichoke plants are extremely vigorous plants and will
        compete strongly with weeds. An early season cultivation is recommended to reduce
        emerging weeds, with a subsequent tillage operation to improve hilling of rows.
    
        2. Chemical - There are no herbicides currently registered for use in Jerusalem
        artichoke.
    
        3. Control of Jerusalem Artichokes in Subsequent Crops - Tubers over-winter very
        well in the soil. As a result, volunteer Jerusalem artichokes can be a serious weed
        problem in the following crop. It spreads into other crops, and will grow even taller
        than corn. One possible herbicide treatment to eliminate Jerusalem artichoke is
        Roundup (glyphosate). [Glyphosate should be applied in the fall to plants which
        were undisturbed all season]. Some Jerusalem artichokes will probably still escape
        and require treatment in subsequent years. 2,4-D and Banvel are effective herbicides
        for control of Jerusalem artichoke.
    
        E. Disease and Their Control:
    
        Few diseases are reported to affect Jerusalem artichoke. The primary disease is Sclerotinia
        (white mold), which can cause early wilt, stalk rot and degradation of the tubers.
        This pathogen also can cause severe yield reductions in dry edible bean, sunflower,
        and soybean.
    
        If possible, susceptible crops should be rotated with small grains or corn. Avoid
        close rotations with dry edible beans, sunflowers, safflower, mustard and soybeans.
        Diseases such as downy mildew, rust and southern stem blight have been reported
        but have not been of economic concern. No fungicides are currently labeled for Jerusalem
        artichokes.
    
        F. Insects and Their Control:
    
        Insects have not been serious problems, but the potential is greater if large acreages
        develop. Stalk boring insects have been observed, but have caused limited damage.
        No insecticides are currently registered for use on the crop.
    
        G. Harvesting:
    
        Harvesting the tuber crop is similar to potatoes, with a few exceptions. The potato
        vine is weak and usually has scenesced before harvest, which is in contrast to the
        continued growth of the strong artichoke stems. Potato tubers separate easily from
        the stems, while the large mass of artichoke tubers are strongly attached and intertwined
        with the roots. By adding small chains and increasing agitation, you can convert
        a potato digger to a Jerusalem artichoke digger. Artichoke tubers are smaller than
        potatoes, so these modifications are necessary to decrease the potential 50% loss
        that may occur with a conventional potato digger. Tops, roots, and tubers can be
        sorted as they are harvested, or they can be dried and then sorted. Artichoke tubers
        will wilt and soften much faster than potato tubers and thus cannot be left at low
        humidities too long before storage.
    
        H. Storage:
    
        Tubers can be harvested in the fall or left in the ground for winter storage and
        spring harvest. Tubers should be stored at 33 to 34o F and at very high
        humidity. Spoilage is more prevalent with diseased, bruised, or skinned tubers.
        Tubers that are kept for seed should not be frozen in storage.
    
        VI. Yield Potential and Performance Results:
    
        Typical tuber yields are approximately 15 ton/acre, with a range of 5 to 25 ton/acre.
        The variety and time of harvest determine the yields for both the tops and tubers.
        Total per plant yield ranges between 4 to 8 lb for tops, 3 to 6 lb for tubers, and
        1 to 2 lb for roots.
    
        
            | Table 5. Tuber yield of four Jerusalem artichoke varieties in 3-row, 20-foot plots
                    at Staples, MN – 1981. | 
        
            | Variety | Tuber Fresh Wt | Tuber Dry Wt | Dry Wt/Tuber | 
        
            |  | lbs/acre | lbs/acre | g | 
        
            | Columbia | 22398 | 5769 | 15.7 | 
        
            | Mammoth (MN) | 8628 | 5166 | 9.3 | 
        
            | Oregon | 12477 | 3096 | 11.4 | 
        
            | Mammoth | 11159 | 5784 | 9.7 | 
        
            |  |  |  |  | 
        
            | LSD | 2612 | 552 | 5.2 | 
        
            | Source: Waters, et. Al., University of Minnesota | 
    
    
        VII. Economics of Production and Markets:
    
        A. Economic Factors:
    
        Economic considerations for artichoke production will depend on numerous factors,
        including equipment and labor costs. Differences in variable and fixed costs make
        it difficult to estimate production expenses, but costs may range from $1,000/acre
        for seed, $60 to 150/acre for custom cutting and planting, $25 to 50/acre for custom
        cultivation, and $250 to 400/acre for custom harvesting. Additional expenses can
        include storage, transportation, and supplemental seedstock.
    
        B. Market Potential:
    
        The seedstock market for Jerusalem artichoke tubers is speculative and should not
        be relied on as an outlet. Between 1980 and 1982, the largest market was for seed
        tubers, which required a constant expanding production. Currently, the only stable
        market is a limited one for the tubers as a gourmet vegetable.
    
        Market viability depends on the development of processing technology and the economic
        feasibility of such facilities. Consumer demand and a stable price for tubers are
        additional factors that contribute to its acceptability. Try to locate a guaranteed
        market and price before growing the crop.
    
        VIII. Information Sources:
    
        The Tropical Tuber Crops. 1978. I. C. Onvueme, Wiley, NY.
    
        Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture. Vols. I and II. 1961. J. J. Ochse, et al.,
        MacMillan Co.
    
        Tropical Agriculture. 1971. G. Wrigley, F. A. Praeger. New York.
    
        Guide for Field Crops in the Tropics and Subtropics. 1974. S. C. Litzenberger. Agency
        for International Development, Washington, DC.
    
        Jerusalem Artichokes Trials. 1981. L. Waters, D. Davis, J. Riehle and M. Weins.
        Department of Horticulture, Mimeo, University of Minnesota, St. Paul Minnesota.